Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (0.39 vs 1.27, Δ 0.88).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.27Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 478Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 559Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.99 | Goals prevented | 0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.