Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.09, Δ 0.40).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 503Lead | Accurate passes | 372 |
| 564Lead | Total passes | 452 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -1.97 | Goals prevented | -1.97 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |