Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 2.78, Δ 2.47).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.78Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 417 | Accurate passes | 551Lead |
| 498 | Total passes | 627Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.