Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 1.09, Δ 0.05).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- New England Revolution was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 363 | Accurate passes | 388Lead |
| 465 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.