Match statistics snapshot
- Nashville SC created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 2.47, Δ 1.14).
- Nashville SC fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.47Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 340 |
| 403 | Total passes | 405Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| -0.20 | Goals prevented | -0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |