Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.71 vs 0.92, Δ 0.21).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- New York City FC held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 308 | Accurate passes | 455Lead |
| 378 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | New York City Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |