Match statistics snapshot
- New England Revolution created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.67, Δ 1.13).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (23 vs 8 shots).
- New England Revolution held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 589Lead | Accurate passes | 304 |
| 658Lead | Total passes | 379 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |