Match statistics snapshot
- Toronto FC created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 0.86, Δ 0.25).
- New England Revolution fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Toronto FC was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 377 |
| 486Lead | Total passes | 449 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.68 | Goals prevented | -0.68 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New England Revolution | Statistic | Toronto Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |