Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 0.98, Δ 0.39).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Charlotte was more accurate in front of goal (88% on target vs 41%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 7 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 426Lead | Accurate passes | 277 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 377 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Charlotte |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |