Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (4.08 vs 0.27, Δ 3.81).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- New York City FC held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4.08Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.27 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 223 |
| 528Lead | Total passes | 285 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 1.34 | Goals prevented | 1.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.