Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 1.36, Δ 0.03).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36 |
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 345 | Accurate passes | 389Lead |
| 426 | Total passes | 478Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -1.37 | Goals prevented | -1.37 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.