Match statistics snapshot
- New York City FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.25 vs 0.81, Δ 0.44).
- New York City FC fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.81 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 315 | Accurate passes | 371Lead |
| 381 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.40 | Goals prevented | 0.40 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |