Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.93 vs 2.32, Δ 1.39).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.93 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.32Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 395 | Accurate passes | 429Lead |
| 458 | Total passes | 494Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.39 | Goals prevented | 0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.