Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 1.45, Δ 0.17).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (22 vs 11 shots).
- New York City FC was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 395 | Accurate passes | 491Lead |
| 468 | Total passes | 544Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.66 | Goals prevented | -0.66 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York City Fc | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.