Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6 | Shots off target | 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target |
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 258Lead |
| 362 | Total passes | 366Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |