Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 10%).
- New York Red Bulls held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 336Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 453Lead | Total passes | 332 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.