Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.34 vs 1.52, Δ 0.18).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (18 vs 5 shots).
- Chicago Fire was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.52Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 394Lead |
| 380 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.