Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.56, Δ 0.86).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (19 vs 9 shots).
- Chicago Fire held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 562Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 650Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |