Match statistics snapshot
- Chicago Fire created the clearer chances on xG (1.36 vs 1.86, Δ 0.50).
- Chicago Fire fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (86% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.86Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 324 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
| 409 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.04 | Goals prevented | -0.04 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |