Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati created the clearer chances on xG (1.05 vs 1.14, Δ 0.09).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 1.05 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.14Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 146 | Accurate passes | 308Lead |
| 251 | Total passes | 428Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |