Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 2.20, Δ 0.70).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 363 |
| 443 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.