Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (1.23 vs 0.26, Δ 0.97).
- New York Red Bulls fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1.23Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.26 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 4 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 225 | Accurate passes | 585Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 706Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.