Match statistics snapshot
- Inter Miami created the clearer chances on xG (0.76 vs 3.07, Δ 2.31).
- Inter Miami fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Inter Miami was more accurate in front of goal (62% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 0.76 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.07Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 565Lead |
| 372 | Total passes | 641Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.03 | Goals prevented | 0.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Inter Miami |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.