Match statistics snapshot
- New York Red Bulls created the clearer chances on xG (3.60 vs 3.20, Δ 0.40).
- Orlando City SC fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- New York Red Bulls was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 3.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 3.20 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 332 | Accurate passes | 532Lead |
| 399 | Total passes | 599Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.14 | Goals prevented | 0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| New York Red Bulls | Statistic | Orlando City Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |