Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 0.89, Δ 0.15).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nice | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.89 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nice | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 428 | Total passes | 531Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nice | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nice | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.05 | Goals prevented | 0.05 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nice | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |