Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (2.21 vs 0.09, Δ 2.12).
- Nice fired more attempts (15 vs 2 shots).
- Nice was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nice | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2.21Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.09 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nice | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 506Lead | Accurate passes | 213 |
| 566Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nice | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nice | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nice | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |