Match statistics snapshot
- Sibenik created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.44, Δ 0.63).
- NK Varazdin fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Sibenik was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nk Varazdin | Statistic | Sibenik |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nk Varazdin | Statistic | Sibenik |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 520Lead | Accurate passes | 208 |
| 615Lead | Total passes | 308 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nk Varazdin | Statistic | Sibenik |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nk Varazdin | Statistic | Sibenik |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nk Varazdin | Statistic | Sibenik |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.