Match statistics snapshot
- Norrköping W created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.35, Δ 0.84).
- Norrköping W fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- KIF Örebro was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Norrköping W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Norrköping W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 343Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 446Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Norrköping W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Norrköping W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Norrköping W | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |