Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W fired more attempts (13 vs 11 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 9%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 413Lead | Accurate passes | 174 |
| 501Lead | Total passes | 268 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |