Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W fired more attempts (4 vs 2 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 165Lead | Accurate passes | 146 |
| 208Lead | Total passes | 195 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Houston Dash W |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.