Match statistics snapshot
- Portland Thorns W created the clearer chances on xG (1.01 vs 1.11, Δ 0.10).
- Portland Thorns W fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.01 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 422Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Portland Thorns W |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |