Match statistics snapshot
- North Carolina Courage W fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- North Carolina Courage W was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
- North Carolina Courage W held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 471Lead | Accurate passes | 231 |
| 554Lead | Total passes | 334 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.