Match statistics snapshot
- Utah Royals W was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 0%).
- Utah Royals W held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 0 | Shots off target |
| 0 | Shots on target | 1Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 22 | Accurate passes | 33Lead |
| 35 | Total passes | 46Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 1Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| North Carolina Courage W | Statistic | Utah Royals W |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Fouls | 1 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |