Match statistics snapshot
- Northampton fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Northampton was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
- Northampton held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Northampton | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Northampton | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 66%Lead | Pass accuracy | 59% |
| 255Lead | Accurate passes | 190 |
| 389Lead | Total passes | 324 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Northampton | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Northampton | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Northampton | Statistic | Carlisle |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.