Match statistics snapshot
- Norwich created the clearer chances on xG (0.67 vs 0.56, Δ 0.11).
- QPR fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- QPR was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Norwich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 0.67Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.56 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Norwich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 288 | Accurate passes | 525Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 610Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Norwich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Norwich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Norwich | Statistic | Qpr |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |