Match statistics snapshot
- Aston Villa created the clearer chances on xG (0.38 vs 1.23, Δ 0.85).
- Aston Villa fired more attempts (13 vs 5 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 0.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.23Lead |
| 9 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 27% | Ball possession | 73%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 172 | Accurate passes | 598Lead |
| 240 | Total passes | 654Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Aston Villa |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.