Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (3.41 vs 0.88, Δ 2.53).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 3.41Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 256 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -2.50 | Goals prevented | -2.50 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Brighton |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |