Match statistics snapshot
- Chelsea created the clearer chances on xG (1.56 vs 1.59, Δ 0.03).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Chelsea was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 1.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 567Lead |
| 284 | Total passes | 623Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Chelsea |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.