Match statistics snapshot
- Crystal Palace created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.90, Δ 1.41).
- Crystal Palace fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Crystal Palace was more accurate in front of goal (21% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.90Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 206 | Accurate passes | 489Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.12 | Goals prevented | -0.12 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Crystal Palace |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |