Match statistics snapshot
- Everton created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 1.36, Δ 0.84).
- Everton fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.36Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 249 | Accurate passes | 362Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 444Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Everton |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |