Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.53 vs 1.50, Δ 0.03).
- Fulham fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.53Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.50 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 252 | Accurate passes | 551Lead |
| 324 | Total passes | 629Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Fulham |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |