Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.68 vs 0.59, Δ 1.09).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Ipswich held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.68Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 238 | Accurate passes | 307Lead |
| 310 | Total passes | 387Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |