Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 2.07, Δ 1.10).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.07Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 571Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 662Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 11Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |