Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (0.31 vs 1.99, Δ 1.68).
- Liverpool fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0.31 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 482Lead |
| 235 | Total passes | 566Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0 | Goals prevented | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |