Match statistics snapshot
- Liverpool created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.73, Δ 0.54).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (18 vs 10 shots).
- Liverpool was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.73Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 348 | Accurate passes | 412Lead |
| 421 | Total passes | 489Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.65 | Goals prevented | 0.65 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Liverpool |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |