Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Luton was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 27%).
- Luton held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 333 | Accurate passes | 427Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 512Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |