Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest created the clearer chances on xG (1.93 vs 0.87, Δ 1.06).
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Manchester City was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 1.93Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.87 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 91%Lead |
| 285 | Accurate passes | 665Lead |
| 350 | Total passes | 733Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.