Match statistics snapshot
- Manchester City created the clearer chances on xG (0.73 vs 0.86, Δ 0.13).
- Manchester City fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.73 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.86Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 547Lead |
| 261 | Total passes | 609Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -0.14 | Goals prevented | -0.14 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Manchester City |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.