Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 30%).
- Reading held more of the ball (56% possession).
Nottingham Forest vs Reading
Nottingham Forest vs Reading
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
| 12 | Total shots | 20Lead |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 329Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 424Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Fouls | 0 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |