Match statistics snapshot
- Nottingham Forest fired more attempts (19 vs 10 shots).
- Nottingham Forest was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 30%).
- Reading held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
| 10 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 392Lead |
| 320 | Total passes | 484Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Nottingham Forest | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |